The Dismantling of Public Education


By Sharon Gallagher-Fishbaugh

Some Utah policymakers only view public education from the 30,000-foot level. The advantage to this perspective is that “bombs” can be dropped on our children and teachers without regard to the consequences to those on the ground.

Let me take you down to ground level. There are about 110 bills before our legislature this year that deal directly or indirectly with public education. I cannot think of another profession that faces so many policy changes year in and year out.

However, I am not necessarily as concerned about the quantity of proposals to change public education as I am about the quality. You see, the vast majority of these bills are conceived, drafted and proposed by individuals who, despite what may well be good intentions, are not experts in education. Many of the proposed laws are based on hearsay, anecdotes and political posturing, rather than research or proven practice.

I realize our elected lawmakers have a difficult and, at times, thankless job. However, I am struck by the lack of understanding about what we do in public education. I am amazed by the audacity of non-educators presuming to know more about educating children than the teachers and administrators who have dedicated their entire careers to the profession. And, I’m disheartened by the misrepresentations, half-truths and outright lies told about what happens in our neighborhood schools and about our teachers.

It’s clear there are a few powerful, well-connected individuals who would much rather dismantle our neighborhood schools than improve them—with the end goal of creating more private and charter schools that serve (and benefit) only a few.

Recent polls show the citizens of Utah overwhelmingly support their traditional neighborhood public schools. Yet just this year, legislation has been proposed that will:

  • Ensure a certain percentage of public schools cannot attain a superior grade rating;
  • Label schools as failing, but not provide any resources to help them improve;
  • Guarantee a certain percentage of public school students are instructed by teachers deemed “non-proficient;”
  • Eliminate requirements to assist teachers who need help improving performance;
  • Politicize public education by making school board elections partisan or diverting control and supervision of public schools from the state school board to the legislature; and
  • Divert funds from our already over-burdened traditional public schools to charter schools.

Each of these proposals individually may not seem too onerous, but together they underlie a much bigger movement to erode and discredit our traditional public schools—schools that currently serve more than 92 percent of Utah’s student population. The proposed laws would also inhibit the state’s ability to provide a quality education for EVERY Utah student.

There’s no question our public schools can be improved. The Utah Education Association has continuously offered to sit down and work with lawmakers to help craft the changes necessary to create a great public school for every child. Alas, our offers have mostly fallen on deaf ears—deaf at least to classroom teachers who teach in neighborhood schools, not, apparently, to non-educator special interests. I can only surmise that blaming teachers for all public education’s woes creates a diversion that will allow the destruction of our traditional public schools.

What is it going to take for some of our elected officials to set aside the self-interests of a few and represent their entire constituency? I hope it does not mean losing the neighborhood schools that educate all children regardless of their circumstance.

I urge our lawmakers to ask themselves just one question as they consider public education laws: “Does this help us reach the goal of a great education for EVERY student?”


Need help understanding the issues, where do I go?

Date Posted: 7/18/2011 1:28:28 AM
Name: Zac Walton

I am neither for or against public and or private education systems, I am a new parent to the Utah public education system and I am trying to form my own opinion of what is best for my children. I feel so under-qualified to even write a word at the end of reading this blog post! As a "non-educator" having a "lack of understanding" I know that I don't know how to educate children, however as a product of Utah public education I know that I went unchallenged and walked away undereducated. I wish I could find REAL debate about why vouchers or charter schools are so terrible for the public education system, alas I am left with debate beginning with "bombs" being dropped on children and teachers. As a parent of three children I have my own "special interest" and it has nothing to do with destroying any person, place or thing, it has everything to do with doing the "right thing" regardless of recent poll results that are paid for by a "few powerful, well connected" ASSOCIATIONS. Please make the argument about how to best educate children rather than why "teachers needing help to improve performance" rather than being relieved from the burden of teaching children. This appears to be nonsense!

Thank You

Date Posted: 3/8/2011 1:36:45 PM
Name: Kay Quealy

Thank you for acknowledging my undergraduate and graduate studies as professional. No other professional: lawyer, doctor, accountant, is treated with so little regard for their education and professionalism as educators are.


Post a Comment




Back to Blog Posts